<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review:  PC-BSD 7.0.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/</link>
	<description>Eric's insights on politics, technology, free software, photography and everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mesa</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-72784</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-72784</guid>
		<description>I also think it&#039;s odd that Distro Watch decided to link to this.  I live-blog when I review distros and after all that time and all those screenshots, I didn&#039;t want to just delete it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it&#8217;s odd that Distro Watch decided to link to this.  I live-blog when I review distros and after all that time and all those screenshots, I didn&#8217;t want to just delete it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E Mouse</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-72738</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-72738</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now, there is one possible side effect of this that would make it a no-go for me as a desktop system. All over the PC-BSD website they talk about how it’s still FreeBSD underneath and you can install from ports. According to the wikipedia page, however, installing unsupported programs from ports like Gnome or Xfce can lead to a broken system. I’ll be testing how true that is later in the review.&quot;

No where is this covered or mentioned again in your &quot;review&quot;. Was this edited by anyone with any kind of degree? The &quot;review&quot; abruptly ends after you admit you&#039;re not doing a REAL install anyways and have just been wasting our time.

I am disappointed that Distrowatch feels there is anything link-worthy here, and that this passes for a &quot;review&quot; in some people&#039;s minds is unfathomable to me. This reads like someone was paid per word but unfortunately has nothing to say, so they go on at length with the introduction trying to distract us from the lack of any substance. 

I would have failed grade 8 with this kind of writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now, there is one possible side effect of this that would make it a no-go for me as a desktop system. All over the PC-BSD website they talk about how it’s still FreeBSD underneath and you can install from ports. According to the wikipedia page, however, installing unsupported programs from ports like Gnome or Xfce can lead to a broken system. I’ll be testing how true that is later in the review.&#8221;</p>
<p>No where is this covered or mentioned again in your &#8220;review&#8221;. Was this edited by anyone with any kind of degree? The &#8220;review&#8221; abruptly ends after you admit you&#8217;re not doing a REAL install anyways and have just been wasting our time.</p>
<p>I am disappointed that Distrowatch feels there is anything link-worthy here, and that this passes for a &#8220;review&#8221; in some people&#8217;s minds is unfathomable to me. This reads like someone was paid per word but unfortunately has nothing to say, so they go on at length with the introduction trying to distract us from the lack of any substance. </p>
<p>I would have failed grade 8 with this kind of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what a waste</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-68315</link>
		<dc:creator>what a waste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-68315</guid>
		<description>What is the point of posting a &quot;REVIEW&quot; if you are not going to review the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the point of posting a &#8220;REVIEW&#8221; if you are not going to review the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mesa</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62812</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62812</guid>
		<description>I determined it wouldn&#039;t work in VirtualBox by checking the PC-BSD forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I determined it wouldn&#8217;t work in VirtualBox by checking the PC-BSD forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anjum</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62791</link>
		<dc:creator>Anjum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62791</guid>
		<description>Ive used QEMU on windows and installed PC-BSD 7.0.1 on a virtual disk. It worked like a charm.

Now you havent really clarified as to what exactly happened leading you to conclude that PC-BSD does not work on VirtualBox.

If the issue is with GUI not starting up, then at boot time use VESA with 16-bit color depth (at 1024x768 resolution). I know for sure that X will crash for 24-bit color depth (not sure if it works at other resolutions at 16 bit depth).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive used QEMU on windows and installed PC-BSD 7.0.1 on a virtual disk. It worked like a charm.</p>
<p>Now you havent really clarified as to what exactly happened leading you to conclude that PC-BSD does not work on VirtualBox.</p>
<p>If the issue is with GUI not starting up, then at boot time use VESA with 16-bit color depth (at 1024&#215;768 resolution). I know for sure that X will crash for 24-bit color depth (not sure if it works at other resolutions at 16 bit depth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62776</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62776</guid>
		<description>Just curious.. Did you choose OS type to be FreeBSD in virtual box? (and I hope you are using Virtualbox 2.0 or higher)

Incidentally, the pcbsd homepage has a prebuilt vmware image available for download. It seems to be for 7.0 instead of 7.0.1 though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious.. Did you choose OS type to be FreeBSD in virtual box? (and I hope you are using Virtualbox 2.0 or higher)</p>
<p>Incidentally, the pcbsd homepage has a prebuilt vmware image available for download. It seems to be for 7.0 instead of 7.0.1 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Links 27/11/2008: GNU/Linux Climbs to Virtually 94% Market Share in Supercomputers, KDE 4.2 @ Beta</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62765</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Links 27/11/2008: GNU/Linux Climbs to Virtually 94% Market Share in Supercomputers, KDE 4.2 @ Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62765</guid>
		<description>[...] Review: PC-BSD 7.0.1 Today’s distro has been described as the Ubuntu of the BSD world. PC-BSD is an easy to use version of FreeBSD. FreeBSD is the behemoth in the BSD world and would probably have a much larger desktop presence if the BSDs hadn’t run into copyright and other proprietary problems right around when most of the GNU toolset was complete and Linus was releasing the Linux kernel. At least, that’s what most people claim. However, given the animosity (although that’s almost too strong a word) between the Free Software Foundation and the supporters of the BSD license. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review: PC-BSD 7.0.1 Today’s distro has been described as the Ubuntu of the BSD world. PC-BSD is an easy to use version of FreeBSD. FreeBSD is the behemoth in the BSD world and would probably have a much larger desktop presence if the BSDs hadn’t run into copyright and other proprietary problems right around when most of the GNU toolset was complete and Linus was releasing the Linux kernel. At least, that’s what most people claim. However, given the animosity (although that’s almost too strong a word) between the Free Software Foundation and the supporters of the BSD license. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rip</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62758</link>
		<dc:creator>rip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62758</guid>
		<description>PBI&#039;s are a security risk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PBI&#8217;s are a security risk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZBREAKER</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62757</link>
		<dc:creator>ZBREAKER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62757</guid>
		<description>THEN WHY WASTE OUR TIME !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THEN WHY WASTE OUR TIME !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/2008/11/26/review-pc-bsd-701/comment-page-1/#comment-62750</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/blog/?p=1749#comment-62750</guid>
		<description>Use VMWare Server. It is free for Windows and Linux use. PC-BSD has always installed and run, even with the vmware tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use VMWare Server. It is free for Windows and Linux use. PC-BSD has always installed and run, even with the vmware tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
